Skip to content

Word by Word

Anne Lamott is one of my favourite writers and the author of my favourite book on writing, Bird by Bird.

What I love about Lamott is her forgiving, generous spirit.  She is the proponent of the shitty first draft; it doesn’t need to be good, it just has to be written.  She understands that 90%  of writing is getting over yourself and your fear.  she is wise and smart and funny and whenever I read or listen to something she has to say I feel like putting pen to paper (or fingers to keyboard).

Recently I listened to a seminar on writing Lamott gave back in the 90s entitled Word by Word.  Here are a few quotes from it:

On plotting:

You don’t try to impose order on it.  You don’t try to make it come out the way that would be most convenient if it did because then you’re not capturing life. Life does not ever come out the way way that would be most convenient for us.

These characters should not serve as pawns for some plot that occurred to you one night when you were sitting around drinking beer with your best friend that you thought Michelle Pfeiffer would be perfect for the lead.

Don’t worry about plot so much.  Worry about character.  Worry about who these people are.  Let what they say and do and how they carry themselves reveal who they are.  And by revealing who they are, that’s going to reveal who we are… who you are.  Be involved in them.  Be involved in their lives and who that are.  And then just keep asking yourself “now what happens?” because the development of relationship is plot.

On stakes:

There’s this one other terrible fly in the ointment besides needing to get the writing done every day, you do need tension.  You do need to get people to turn the page.  I hate that, but it’s true.  The way you do that… is you keep asking yourself “what’s at stake here?  What do these people stand to lose?  What is the most unbearable intolerable thing that they can imagine happening?” For those of us that are parents, it’s obvious. It’s  something happening to your child.  So once you set up that a parent’s life and focus and whole reason for being is tied up with his child or her child or his wife or her husband or whatever you’ve got some tension because you start thinking “oh god, no.  Don’t let the bad thing happen.” But without bad things happeneing there’s no story.

We want to see our own lives reflected in the stuff that we’re reading.  We want to see people who have had the bad thing happen and who have lived to tell.  We want to see stories of redemption.  We want to see stories where people get something that is life changing and that causes them to have an awakening, that causes chapter two to being their lives… We want to see the dramas of humankind acted out in these characters.

On protecting characters:

We have had so much to lose and have lost so much and [our characters] need to too.  It’s very tempting to protect your characters.  To not let anything bad happen to them.  And if you do, we’re probably not going to turn the page.  That’s the terrible news.

Twitter Part II

Say you did sign up for Twitter — and a few of you have — what next?  There are some cool people to follow, depending on your interests, although they’re not all easy to find.

Show biz Tweeters:

Tina Fey, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon, John Cleese, Penn Jillette and Britney Spears — not all of whom are prolific (I’m talking about you, Colbert).

Politics:

Obama, Congress, Downing Street, Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton, Romanian Prime Minister Calin Popescu Tariceanu

Web 2.0:

Felicia Day, Dr. HorribleBoing Boing, ze frank, Geekerati, Matthew Ingram, Wired, Kelly Lynne Ashton

Canadian TV scene:

John Doyle, Diane Wild, Denis McGrath, Karen Walton, Rob Mills, Caroline Grodin.

The wider Scribosphere:

John August, Red Right HandRaelee, Ken Levine.

And many many many more.  If you want fellow writers to find you on Twitter, feel free to leave your user name in the comments.

Also, check out Rob Mills’ blog post on Twitter — the third Ouroboros reference in recent memory and great reading.

Ooo, more late breaking Twitter talk from  TV Squad with more tv types to follow (and some overlap)!

Twitter and the Wired Writer

Do you need Twitter?  Maybe.  A lot of you have recently signed on and now I’m wondering if Twitter is the new Facebook.  And more importantly, what can Twitter do for writers?

When I joined Facebook – was it only a couple of years ago? – few of the writers I knew were using it.  At first, I couldn’t really figure out what the big deal about Facebook was.  I knew I wanted to do some storytelling using its tools, but I didn’t get the whole social networking phenomenon…mostly because I didn’t have many friends.

Then suddenly it seemed like everyone joined at once.  Friend requests started rolling in.   And Fb became really useful to me.

Partly it was because I had regular access to writers I knew and liked and they had access to me.  I connected to a whole lot of writers I hadn’t known before and through their status updates and photos started to get to know quite a bit about them.  And not just writers, broadcast execs, producers, directors, actors…  It was like a daily dose of networking.

At the same time, the great Karen Walton made Face even more useful by moving Ink Canada onto it.  Suddenly there was a space for discussing craft and meeting other writers.

Then came the parties and events.  Facebook made it incredibly easy to run events that spread widely to writers, agents and executives, including Denis’ and Alex’s fantastic writer mafia parties, WWTV and lately the Ink events.  These helped to make us not just Facebook friends, but a living breathing in person community.

Back before writers started turning up on Face, I could never have guessed that a website would do so much for writers.

(I should mention that scribosphere has been a vital part of this process.  There are so many screenwriting bloggers out there doing fantastic work that helps to build a sense of a writing community.)

Now writers are starting to turn up on Twitter.  There have been a few of us for a while (but Robbo and I are the most verbose).  But in the last couple of weeks there’s been an influx… and when Ink and heywriterboy turn up, you know the party’s starting.

What are writers going to do on Twitter?  I’ve done a couple of things:

I did a whole lot of Story2.OH on Twitter.  You can still find Ali and Simon there (unlike on Facebook), although they aren’t active at the moment.

I’ve Twittered my notes during quite a few conferences including three NextMedia events, ICE, the Banff television festival and AdTech New York.   I also twittered the Geminis.

picture-1.png

Once, when I was stuck in an airport, I sent out an SOS and my twitter friends suggested lots of websites I could go to watch streamed TV shows and movies.

But mostly, I use Twitter to lament my inability to cook.

Doesn’t that sound like something you need more of in your life?

I can’t say why you should jump onto Twitter and start using it wildly. Back in the day, I didn’t know why you needed a Facebook account.  But you did and you made it into something pretty cool.  And I suspect the same thing’s gonna happen with Twitter.  If you go start using it, you’ll turn it into a writer place in ways I can’t imagine right now.  I just ask one small favour, don’t forget to follow jill380!

NOTE: For more on Twitter, check out Rob’s post on the Twitter HoHoTo event.

Another Strike?!

Do you want to join the Glorious Struggle?

Yes, I want to join the Glorious Struggle!

What to Give a Writer

It’s getting a little too close to gift giving time.  Do you know what you’re getting the writers in your life? I have a number of DVD sets that I’d like to recommend.

State of Play

I’d heard a lot about this British miniseries but could never find it until recently when I ordered it from Amazon.  I started watching it under the worst conditions: on my teeny portable DVD player in ten minute chunks before passing out at night.  Yet very quickly I was totally hooked.  Tense, layered, beautiful writing.

Why a writer will love it: a great model of how to do a 6-pack, just the right number of characters and a perfect amount of story.

I Love Lucy

Yes, Lucy is still fresh and funny even after all these years.  And in an era when everything is changing and we’ve got new media to explore, it’s great to look back to the pioneers of television and see how they did it.

Why a writer will love it: the roots of everything we write today are right here.

Sling and Arrows

Slings and Arrows is a thing of perfection.  It’s got a perfect comic tone, quirky characters and a story line that delivers.  It never fails to put me in a great mood which is a truly wonderful thing.  The complete series will make a great addition to any writer’s collection.

Why a writer will love it: The series’ voice is so clear, the characters are original and the energy never flags.

The Wire

I watched the first season and then watched it again immediately.  Even if you’ve watched the entire series, there is so much packed into every episode that you watch it many more times and still get something out of it.

Why a writer will love it: story story story.  Dense, rich satisfying stor that you can watch over and over and over again.

Not Just the Best of the Larry Sanders Show

This DVD set is the best gift I have ever recieved (thank you, Bobby).  Not only are the episodes great but the special features are nothing short of brilliant.  Forget giving this as a gift, buy it for yourself.  You deserve it.  Seriously.

Why a writer will love it: Garry Shandling pioneered the cable series and so much of what we love on television today is a direct descendant of the series.  And it launched about a zillion careers including Jon Stewart’s, Jeremy Pivens, Tommy Schlamme, Judd Aptow,  Carol Leifer, Jeffrey Tambor, Janeane Garofalo, Sarah Silverman.

On my personal wishlist:  Deadwood the Complete Series,  which is bound to be great.

If you haven’t sent Santa your wishlist yet, put it in the comments section or send it off to Santa via this cool app from ze frank.

Political Drama

I’ve been whining about having nothing to watch recently, but for the last couple of weeks I’ve been glued to my new favourite television drama: Canadian politics.  It’s had all the important elements: quirky flawed characters, passion, enormous stakes and a twisting, turning plot.  No wonder citizens are suddenly engaged.

I wish I had the time to systematically analyze the whole thing from a story perspective because I’m pretty sure I could learn a lot.  A few things have struck me:

This story means very different things to different people.  Audience/voter point of view brings a tremendous amount of meaning to the tale.  The fact that it can be read so many different ways is part of what makes the story so compelling.  If I was writing this, I would be tempted to shade it so that everyone saw the story from my P.O.V.  But in fact people care about this and find water cooler fodder in it precisely because they can interpret it their own way.

The inciting incident — Harper’s attempt to eliminate funding to the political parties — was a big move and definitely in character for him.  It threatened the well-being of the other parties and triggered a big, out-of-character and dangerous response.  We’re used to these men “staying on message” and not taking risks.  So when they did take a risk, it made you take notice.  And the fact that the action was riding on intense feeling made it riveting.

The emotion has worked on two levels — at least for me.  I am convinced that all the leaders believe in their own ideologies.  But there has been that second layer of emotion this week too.  It looks to me like Dion, Layton and Duceppe hate Harper and he hates them right back.

But alas, my new favourite TV show has taken a 6 week hiatus.  Whatever you think of it politically, in story terms you have to agree this is a drama-killer.  The energy and passion are going to disappate over the next month and a half.  Behind the scenes tinkering is inevitable, including recasting.  But putting a leading man-type in the starring roles might be good politics but it’ll suck dramatically.  The storyrooms/backrooms will be reconfigured and the new writers are going to drop the coalition like a hot potato — a kinky threesome is no place for a leading man.  And we’ll be right back to sleepy Canadian politics.

The optimistic among us may believe that that will be good for the economy, but I don’t really believe that there’s all that much that can be done to turn the tide at this point.  And what I really want is some more high drama to distract me from my bank statements.

Writers Guild Awards

DEADLINE EXTENSION

Nominations are still open for the 13th Annual WGC Screenwriting Awards.

It’s not too late…yet - so get your script in this week.

New deadline for nominations is Monday, December 8, 2008, by 5:30pm EST.

The 2009 WGC Screenwriting Awards will be held in Toronto on April 20, 2009.

Watch the Old Cupid

Quick! Before they take it down.

Someone has uploaded the original Cupid series to YouTube.  Cupid was created by Rob Thomas and starred Jeremy Piven.  There are 15 episodes on YouTube.  Catch ‘em before they disappear.

In other Cupid news, according to Alan Sepinwall, the new version of Cupid will be a collaboration between Thomas and Veronica Mars collaborator Diane Ruggiero.  Here’s the trailer for the new series.

What do you think? New one? Old one? How do they compare? Is the old one good enough to watch all over again in pieces on YouTube? Does the trailer for the new one make you think there’s hope for network tv afterall?

M.I.T. Takes on the Future of Storytelling

According to a New York Times story the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory is planning to study the future of storytelling.  The initiative is funded by David Kirkpatrick, who used to be president of the Paramount Pictures motion picture group and more recently started Plymouth Rock Studios, a future film production center in Massachusetts.  Plymouth Rock will house the new MIT lab and finance it to the tune $25 million over seven years.

Cool.  Scientific study of story… Or maybe not.  To quote my brother Jody “I’m not entirely comfortable with their initial assumptions.”  The starting point is the belief…

…that Hollywood’s ability to tell a meaningful story has been nibbled at by text messages, interrupted by cellphone calls and supplanted by everything from Twitter to Guitar Hero.

“I even saw a plasma screen above a urinal,” said Peter Guber, the longtime film producer and former chairman of Sony Pictures Entertainment who contends that traditional narrative — the kind with unexpected twists and satisfying conclusions — has been drowned out by noise and visual clutter.

A common gripe is that gamelike, open-ended series like “Pirates of the Caribbean” or “Spider-Man” have eroded filmmakers’ ability to wrap up their movies in the third act. Another is that a preference for proven, outside stories like the Harry Potter books is killing Hollywood’s appetite for original storytelling.

They should talk to David Milch about endings!

Gruber, who teaches a course at UCLA called Navigating in a Narrative World actually blames the audience:

Ultimately, he blames the audience for the perceived breakdown in narrative quality: in the end, he argued, consumers get what they want. Bobby Farrelly, a prolific writer, and director with his brother Peter of comedies like “There’s Something About Mary” and “Shallow Hal,” concurred.

“If you go off the beaten path, say, give them something bittersweet, they’re going to tell you they’re disappointed,” Mr. Farrelly said. He spoke from his home in Massachusetts, where he is working on the script for a Three Stooges picture, and said he missed complex stories like that of “The Graduate.”

At the risk of further endangering the quality of narrative, let me say: LOL.

Luckily, there are those with another point of view on this:

At the Sundance Institute, as it happens, other deep thinkers tend to think that film storytelling is doing okay.

“Storytelling is flourishing in the world at a level I can’t even begin to understand,” said Ken Brecher, the institute’s executive director. Mr. Brecher spoke last week, as his colleagues continued sorting through 9,000 films — again, a record — that have been submitted for the coming Sundance Film Festival.

The idea of studying story is a good one.  Story is indeed changed by any new medium we use to tell our tales and is thus in constant flux.  And every step along the way someone screams bloody murder that we’ll all going to be permanently perverted by it.

Dime store novels, comics, television, video games have all been reviled somewhere along the line…  but usually by parents or preachers.  It’s odd to hear the cry raised by Hollywood.  But then again, maybe the worry isn’t so much about the health of story as it is about the well-being of a revenue model.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Milch, Deadwood, Endings

TV Eye’s Roger Catlin got an advance look at the 19-disc, 36 hour “Deadwood: The Complete Series” that I want for Christmas (hint, hint).  One of the special features has David Milch on the abandoned Deadwood set talking about how he would have ended the series had he had his way.

Endings that supposedly “fixes the mark and meaning of any experience is one of the lies agreed upon that we use to organize our lives,” he says. A bigger lie, he says, is that “we were entitled to a meaningful and coherent summarizing of something which never concludes.”

Go read Catlin’s piece and then head over to Amazon to pre-order me a copy… Don’t leave your shopping till the last minute.